tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8322638.post112107006715196028..comments2023-10-22T18:06:06.314+08:00Comments on Playing from Home: Sub-super thoughtsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8322638.post-1165126549760294942006-12-03T14:15:00.000+08:002006-12-03T14:15:00.000+08:00best regards, nice info » »best regards, nice info <BR/><A HREF="http://www.teeth-whitening-san-francisco.info/Incate-approved-on-line-colleges-for-georgia.html" REL="nofollow">»</A> <A HREF="http://www.rosacea-skin-care.info/Buildaawning.html" REL="nofollow">»</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8322638.post-1121135254141012392005-07-12T10:27:00.000+08:002005-07-12T10:27:00.000+08:00Fair enough- England came precariously close to sa...Fair enough- England came precariously close to sacrificing a bowler the other day. I guess my only fear is that the super sub will not be used because of such circumstances- which, given that there <I>are</I> new rules in place, seems a bit pointless to me.<BR/><BR/>I think the ICC and the committe may not have ( I could be presumptous here) actually thought what are their <I>objectives</I> in introducing the super sub rulings. Sure, it sounds exciting and new...but how exactly will it enrich the game may have been under-thought.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8322638.post-1121120840551048332005-07-12T06:27:00.000+08:002005-07-12T06:27:00.000+08:00I kind of agree with you, akr. However, I can also...I kind of agree with you, akr. However, I can also see some positives for the rules as they now stand. For example, England had to consider bringing in their super-sub Solanki as they continued to lose wickets at Lord's. Do they sacrifice one of their bowlers in order to add another batsman? That was probably a big issue for them. I guess it just made it a little trickier for everyone involved.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com